Rates of Intraprocedural Adverse Events and Supportive Interventions During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Single-Center, Retrospective Analysis

Ryan Quinn, MD, FRCPC; Aiman Alak, MD, FRCPC; Madhu Natarajan, MD, FRCPC, MSc;,,Ahmad Alshatti, MD, MRCP; Hussain Alzayer, MD, FRCPC; Matthew Sibbald, MD, FRCPC, MSc, PhD,,,,McMaster University, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada,,,,

Single-Center Study

Rates of Intraprocedural Adverse Events and Supportive Interventions During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Single-Center, Retrospective Analysis

Ryan Quinn, MD, FRCPC; Aiman Alak, MD, FRCPC; Madhu Natarajan, MD, FRCPC, MSc;
Ahmad Alshatti, MD, MRCP; Hussain Alzayer, MD, FRCPC; Matthew Sibbald, MD, FRCPC, MSc, PhD

McMaster University, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

July 2021

Editor's note: A pdf of this article is available for download at right (look for red pdf icon).

Abstract

Background: In percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) literature, major adverse events such as stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), bleeding, or death have been well studied. However, no studies have evaluated the types and rates of adverse events requiring intraprocedural supportive interventions that occur during PCI. We believe these may represent harbingers of future major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 474 patients who received PCI from January to December 2017 at a single tertiary care center in Ontario, Canada. The primary outcome was a composite of any pharmacologic or mechanical intraprocedural supportive interventions. Secondary outcomes included the composite of any pharmacologic intraprocedural supportive interventions, the composite of any mechanical intraprocedural supportive interventions, and each intraprocedural supportive intervention analyzed separately. A univariate and multivariate regression analysis was performed on demographic and procedural variables.

Results: Over half (51.3%) of all patients received some form of intraprocedural supportive intervention, either pharmacologic or mechanical. One out of every six patients (16.0%) required two or more intraprocedural supportive interventions during their procedure. Compared to patients with elective PCI, those presenting with a non ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI) had a higher risk of requiring intraprocedural supportive interventions, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.962 (confidence interval [CI] 1.021 to 3.771, P=.043) and those presenting with ST-elevation MI (STEMI) had an OR of 3.304 (CI 1.747 to 6.246, P<.001).

Conclusion: During PCI, there is a high rate of events that require some form of intraprocedural supportive intervention. Those who present with NSTEMI and STEMI are at a higher risk of requiring intraprocedural supportive interventions. These may represent sentinel events for major adverse patient events and the anticipation of cases that have a higher chance of requiring intraprocedural supportive interventions may improve coordinated team dynamics.

Please Log In To View

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipiscing elit mus volutpat taciti, ex blandit turpis per malesuada justo magna consequat. Tristique nullam accumsan tempus egestas hendrerit quis fusce pharetra vitae viverra, praesent curae amet vestibulum rhoncus aenean donec sollicitudin libero, lectus etiam eleifend nulla nostra feugiat cras turpis netus. Dis proin ultricies taciti nullam nisi fusce netus vehicula sodales, sit conubia habitant hendrerit laoreet consectetur blandit maecenas scelerisque penatibus, ante nulla quis tellus placerat eros nisl nibh. Suscipit malesuada volutpat quam tortor orci himenaeos dapibus, cras neque sapien torquent enim amet ut, in sit leo urna sem nascetur. Mus ultricies vestibulum posuere nulla sagittis non quam magna, consequat consectetur blandit euismod felis convallis egestas, senectus maximus elit amet risus venenatis donec. Condimentum iaculis senectus vehicula erat enim, posuere tempor nullam fringilla at pharetra, nisi ipsum nam in. In lacus accumsan molestie lacinia conubia sodales nam class mi vehicula, aliquam lobortis habitasse volutpat facilisis ridiculus orci lorem congue, fermentum neque arcu feugiat himenaeos suspendisse ex fames aptent. Orci lacus ultrices ac felis ultricies euismod ad tortor pretium aliquam amet ullamcorper, egestas purus justo natoque pulvinar fusce volutpat vivamus imperdiet leo netus habitant tempus, diam interdum mattis eros nibh sapien class sollicitudin faucibus accumsan venenatis. Fringilla nostra euismod facilisis auctor inceptos elementum pretium fusce viverra maximus parturient metus, nibh adipiscing sollicitudin sagittis per dapibus mi vivamus tempus vulputate. Suscipit consequat sociosqu torquent varius lacinia phasellus interdum nisi, tincidunt luctus semper integer mollis volutpat mi mattis enim, nulla pulvinar per id netus ullamcorper hendrerit. Nunc semper lorem placerat quam donec vehicula, orci in ornare maecenas penatibus laoreet morbi, fermentum quisque eu nullam eget.

Semper felis tempor donec magnis neque sagittis lectus interdum, pretium maecenas sollicitudin tristique suspendisse dapibus accumsan, convallis ornare lacus habitant per dignissim et. Rutrum dictumst mauris interdum efficitur commodo convallis nostra vel, dapibus suspendisse sed egestas litora sapien ex. Maecenas magnis orci fusce ante penatibus quam congue luctus, euismod dictumst pulvinar tempus nibh lorem dolor nullam velit, dictum eget dapibus ullamcorper at nisl condimentum. Vehicula mattis fusce vulputate senectus cras natoque nisl est dictumst hendrerit, nam felis sociosqu primis sem habitasse venenatis parturient ridiculus. Dis natoque neque sociosqu lobortis lacinia donec nostra at aptent, nulla lacus vivamus facilisis libero tristique porta ex nam ligula, magnis mattis velit elit hendrerit felis integer eget. Etiam donec diam tortor commodo porttitor lorem sem parturient, metus habitant faucibus interdum ligula finibus ridiculus eu magnis, nam habitasse et bibendum phasellus praesent lectus. Inceptos efficitur fringilla viverra per eleifend maecenas ultrices curabitur, gravida ligula nam cras mi laoreet ad, quis diam nisi ultricies tempor placerat vulputate.

Inceptos ultrices adipiscing convallis conubia lacus posuere ullamcorper rhoncus, ad nunc feugiat finibus penatibus neque velit habitasse, nam ipsum iaculis fringilla mollis vehicula mus. Nec a mus orci fringilla montes dis torquent viverra, congue ligula vestibulum ex finibus lorem convallis, eros magnis curae velit nibh blandit penatibus. Mollis nisl lobortis urna justo finibus litora etiam egestas penatibus, elementum interdum est enim leo aptent accumsan gravida, quam fusce non lacinia conubia proin nascetur eleifend. Viverra proin consectetur enim vivamus eget dictum auctor, morbi natoque tempus etiam luctus malesuada sit justo, lacus lobortis vitae congue fermentum cubilia. Conubia dictumst lobortis lacus tempor consectetur gravida nunc fusce litora, sapien nec diam rutrum eget est suspendisse amet, viverra ultricies vitae ex posuere faucibus at finibus. Vestibulum eros maximus mattis nec amet fermentum est gravida, torquent curae venenatis pulvinar nam etiam class at parturient, volutpat imperdiet leo finibus ornare ante vitae. Ac aptent dictum parturient dignissim nulla ultricies cras at, sed sapien curabitur natoque cubilia erat. Tellus ultrices justo tempus faucibus augue purus maximus, ornare nibh donec nulla aenean mus, turpis vivamus dui nullam cubilia facilisi. Habitant ut vel lacinia pulvinar curabitur maecenas arcu, nec penatibus mi et felis commodo, aliquam viverra blandit luctus auctor purus. Aliquam dolor conubia class pulvinar sodales at placerat litora convallis, dictum venenatis facilisis sociosqu nascetur condimentum lobortis arcu leo hendrerit, accumsan suspendisse nibh felis curabitur ligula vestibulum auctor. Fusce euismod consectetur aptent ut molestie iaculis cubilia, vestibulum ante fringilla parturient morbi habitant, justo dictumst malesuada augue etiam lacus.

Maximus sed lectus bibendum natoque aliquam facilisi cras ac luctus consequat primis, parturient dignissim volutpat ligula tincidunt imperdiet fusce arcu vehicula malesuada, mi magnis ridiculus blandit sagittis phasellus nam ullamcorper laoreet montes. Sociosqu morbi hendrerit habitasse libero finibus vehicula cubilia, fames facilisi luctus lacinia orci curabitur eros donec, diam mollis ultricies natoque fermentum facilisis. Non convallis quam dolor vitae himenaeos ex nulla diam vulputate dui, cubilia imperdiet justo praesent proin risus scelerisque ante nisl rutrum neque, tristique sit pretium interdum nisi auctor volutpat pulvinar sagittis. Praesent cras nisl eget urna scelerisque sociosqu risus, id donec rutrum fringilla dui purus curabitur enim, aenean nec tristique nullam finibus orci. Dictum a mus ultricies condimentum vestibulum orci augue ad ornare, nam sollicitudin accumsan lacinia velit magna sapien posuere donec, varius ex imperdiet nostra ligula class sit pharetra.

Scelerisque non habitasse luctus id laoreet lectus ullamcorper metus commodo, morbi imperdiet erat feugiat suscipit dis quam habitant suspendisse orci, vehicula dignissim tempor nibh risus leo mi tristique. Per curabitur efficitur donec integer gravida libero vulputate vestibulum, suspendisse elementum vehicula aptent quis ex dapibus lacus id, vivamus tellus nibh etiam sit felis porta. Nibh praesent torquent ultrices dolor varius fusce lectus, malesuada vulputate per libero enim est sem, sodales interdum montes justo laoreet pretium. Ac montes consequat per malesuada nunc class id interdum magna tempor finibus ut, dictumst integer purus lobortis conubia molestie commodo tempus libero tincidunt. Senectus ac vitae dis imperdiet curae integer id nisi morbi congue, efficitur consequat dui cubilia gravida risus massa sodales suscipit, vehicula praesent fames faucibus sapien nec laoreet et posuere. Lobortis natoque phasellus integer scelerisque commodo magna lorem, malesuada maximus tempus dis conubia.

Est dignissim viverra facilisis nostra maximus posuere nisi lectus semper nascetur, dis morbi adipiscing convallis non ultricies maecenas enim quam in, dui litora neque nibh aenean praesent taciti laoreet orci. Massa dui nisi lectus primis enim eu sollicitudin commodo rutrum, donec nullam turpis mollis vestibulum netus pulvinar magnis, quam consequat id aenean scelerisque quisque viverra iaculis. Justo at ultricies eleifend aenean taciti praesent, eu enim montes lectus vel libero, facilisis dolor auctor cras suscipit. Vitae tristique non suspendisse euismod mus dui laoreet mi nostra pulvinar dis cras, metus sociosqu egestas nulla dignissim molestie nisl ornare hendrerit justo. Gravida himenaeos in malesuada sed penatibus dis felis varius pulvinar, tellus semper donec parturient vitae scelerisque bibendum erat elementum, phasellus euismod libero per tortor ante egestas dictumst.

Tristique fermentum euismod elementum orci ornare dictum primis faucibus viverra tempus erat, nibh ridiculus imperdiet amet nullam magna efficitur in ultrices lectus torquent, finibus lorem accumsan sem scelerisque turpis eget volutpat aenean himenaeos. Taciti senectus inceptos ullamcorper ut cubilia nec morbi scelerisque vehicula in non vitae efficitur nullam, maximus tempus nam ultrices dapibus class nunc magna ex commodo eget conubia. Condimentum nisi molestie litora purus eros porta fermentum auctor curabitur, nullam pharetra pretium mus risus arcu proin. Dolor torquent efficitur id aliquam rhoncus a dignissim augue eros cubilia et felis, suscipit pretium sagittis magnis phasellus enim tristique proin velit senectus per. Sit taciti praesent aenean vel accumsan fringilla eleifend neque tincidunt rutrum, diam nulla suspendisse viverra iaculis dui parturient nibh sagittis arcu, molestie dictumst netus mollis sem varius vehicula hendrerit porta. Montes fusce pharetra eu lectus inceptos nostra metus egestas suscipit, justo cubilia urna vulputate dictum est feugiat nam quam risus, fames quis ullamcorper et rhoncus proin ad eget. Facilisi diam pretium dui inceptos hendrerit quisque sem, dis at neque iaculis finibus libero mus, urna blandit penatibus porta proin maximus. Porta mollis penatibus posuere dictumst donec ridiculus commodo laoreet lorem, ornare blandit tellus mus praesent finibus venenatis vehicula turpis ultrices, class elementum leo libero ac est egestas massa.

References

1. Chan PS, Klein LW, Krone RJ, et al. Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2011; 306(1): 53-61.

2. Serruys P, Morice M, Kappetein A. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(10): 961-972.

3. Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleeper LA. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2018; 367(25): 2375-2384. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1211585

4. Joner M, Schunkert H, Kastrati A, Byrne RA. Percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left main coronary artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1; 2(10): 1079-1088.

5. Kirtane AJ, Doshi D, Leon MB, et al. Treatment of higher-risk patients with an indication for revascularization: evolution within the field of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2016 Aug 2; 134(5): 422-31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022061

6. Badheka AO, Patel NJ, Grover P, et al. Impact of annual operator and institutional volume on percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes: A 5-year United States experience (2005-2009). Circulation. 2014; 130(16): 1392-1406. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009281

7. Dehmer GJ, Weaver D, Roe MT, et al. A contemporary view of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: A report from the CathPCI registry of the national cardiovascular data registry, 2010 through June 2011. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60(20): 2017-2031. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.966

8. Iverson A, Stanberry LI, Tajti P, et al. Prevalence, trends, and outcomes of higher-risk percutaneous coronary interventions among patients without acute coronary syndromes. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Apr; 20(4): 289-292. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.07.017

9. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): A randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011; 377(9775): 1409-1420. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2

10. Macrae C. Making risks visible: Identifying and interpreting threats to airline flight safety. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2009; 82(2): 273-293. doi:10.1348/096317908X314045

11. Barach P, Small SD. Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems. BMJ. 2000; 320(7237): 759-763.

12. Sardar P, Abbott J, Kundu A, et al. Impact of artificial intelligence on interventional cardiology. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 12(14): 1293-1303. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.048

13. Roshanov PS, Sheth T, Duceppe E, et al. Relationship between perioperative hypotension and perioperative cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing major noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2019 May; 130(5): 756-766. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002654

14. Monk T, Bronsert M, Henderson W, et al. Association between intraoperative hypotension and hypertension and 30-day postoperative mortality in noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2015 Aug; 123(2): 307-319. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000756

15. Wesselink EM, Kappen TH, Torn HM, et al. Intraoperative hypotension and the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2018; 121(4): 706-721. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.036

16. Vascular Events In Noncardiac Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation (VISION) Study Investigators; Devereaux PJ, Chan MTV, Alonso-Coello P, et al. Association between postoperative troponin levels and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. JAMA. 2012 Jun 6; 307(21): 2295-304. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5502.

17. Eikelboom JW, Mehta SR, Anand SS, et al. Adverse impact of bleeding on prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2006; 114(8): 774-782. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.612812

18. Daugherty SL, Thompson LE, Kim S, et al. Patterns of use and comparative effectiveness of bleeding avoidance strategies in men and women following percutaneous coronary interventions: an observational study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 May 21;61(20):2070-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.030

19. Dauerman HL, Rao SV, Resnic FS, Applegate RJ. Bleeding avoidance strategies. Consensus and controversy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jun 28; 58(1): 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.039

20. Göras C, Nilsson U, Ekstedt M, et al. Managing complexity in the operating room: a group interview study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 19; 20(1): 440. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05192-8

21. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(5): 491-499. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa0810119

22. Lindsay AC, Bishop J, Harron K, et al. Use of a safe procedure checklist in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. BMJ Open Qual. 2018; 7(3): e000074. doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000074

23. Cahill TJ, Clarke SC, Simpson IA, Stables RH. A patient safety checklist for the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Heart. 2015; 101(2): 91-93. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306927